Monthly Archive for November, 2005

U.S. used white phosphorus in Iraq

U.S. troops used white phosphorus as a weapon in last year’s offensive in the Iraqi city of Falluja, the U.S. has said.

“It was used as an incendiary weapon against enemy combatants,” spokesman Lt Col Barry Venable told the BBC – though not against civilians, he said.

The US had earlier said the substance – which can cause burning of the flesh – had been used only for illumination.

BBC defence correspondent Paul Wood says having to retract its denial is a public relations disaster for the US.

Col Venable denied that white phosphorous constituted a banned chemical weapon.


White phosphorus is an incendiary weapon, not a chemical weapon.
Col Barry Venable
Pentagon spokesman

Washington is not a signatory to an international treaty restricting the use of the substance against civilians.

The US state department had earlier said white phosphorus had been used in Falluja very sparingly, for illumination purposes.

Col Venable said that statement was based on “poor information”.

‘Incendiary’

The US-led assault on Falluja – a stronghold of the Sunni insurgency west of Baghdad – displaced most of the city’s 300,000 population and left many of its buildings destroyed.

Col Venable told the BBC’s PM radio programme that the US army used white phosphorus incendiary munitions “primarily as obscurants, for smokescreens or target marking in some cases.

“However it is an incendiary weapon and may be used against enemy combatants.”

And he said it had been used in Falluja, but it was a “conventional munition”, not a chemical weapon.

It is not “outlawed or illegal”, Col Venable said.

He said US forces could use white phosphorus rounds to flush enemy troops out of covered positions.

“The combined effects of the fire and smoke – and in some case the terror brought about by the explosion on the ground – will drive them out of the holes so that you can kill them with high explosives,” he said.

San Diego journalist Darrin Mortenson, who was embedded with US marines during the assault on Falluja, told the BBC’s Today radio programme he had seen white phosphorous used “as an incendiary weapon” against insurgents.

However, he “never saw anybody intentionally use any weapon against civilians”, he said.

‘Particularly nasty’

White phosphorus is highly flammable and ignites on contact with oxygen. If the substance hits someone’s body, it will burn until deprived of oxygen.

Globalsecurity.org, a defence website, says: “Phosphorus burns on the skin are deep and painful… These weapons are particularly nasty because white phosphorus continues to burn until it disappears… it could burn right down to the bone.”

A spokesman at the UK Ministry of Defence said the use of white phosphorus was permitted in battle in cases where there were no civilians near the target area.

But Professor Paul Rodgers, of the University of Bradford’s department of peace studies, said white phosphorus could be considered a chemical weapon if deliberately aimed at civilians.

He told PM: “It is not counted under the chemical weapons convention in its normal use but, although it is a matter of legal niceties, it probably does fall into the category of chemical weapons if it is used for this kind of purpose directly against people.”

When an Italian TV documentary revealing the use of white phosphorus in Iraq was broadcast on 8 November it sparked fury among Italian anti-war protesters, who demonstrated outside the US embassy in Rome.

Story from BBC NEWS
Published: 2005/11/16 11:25:36 GMT
© BBC MMV

No-Bid Contract to Replace Schools After Katrina Is Faulted

From the NY Times
November 11, 2005
By ERIC LIPTON

BAY ST. LOUIS, Miss., Nov. 10 – From their new metal-encased classroom, the third graders who returned to school this week can look straight into the carcass of the old North Bay Elementary.

To the Federal Emergency Management Agency, the modular classrooms lined up next to the soon-to-be demolished former school show, as the billboard out front boasts, “Katrina Recovery in Progress.”

But to critics, the 450 portable classrooms being installed across Mississippi are prime examples in their case against FEMA and its federal partner, the Army Corps of Engineers, for wasteful spending and favoritism in the $62 billion hurricane relief effort.

Provided by a politically connected Alaskan-owned business under a $40 million no-bid contract, the classrooms cost FEMA nearly $90,000 each, including transportation, according to contracting documents. That is double the wholesale price and nearly 60 percent higher than the price offered by two small Mississippi businesses dropped from the deal.

In addition, the portable buildings were not secured in a concrete foundation, as usually required by state regulations because of safety concerns in a region prone to hurricanes and tornados.

The classroom contract has already prompted a lawsuit from one of the Mississippi companies and a government investigation.

“The fact that natural disasters are not precisely predictable must not be an excuse for careless contracting practices,” David E. Cooper from the Government Accountability Office, told Congress recently. In testimony submitted this week, Mr. Cooper said, “We found information in the corps’ contract files and from other sources that suggest the negotiated prices were inflated.”

Officials at Akima Management Services, the contractor that got the job, say they that while the cost was high, this was not a case of price gouging. The speed demanded in installing the classrooms required charging a premium, said John D. Wood, the company’s president.

“What we provided to the government was a fair and reasonable cost given the emergency conditions and the risks,” Mr. Wood said. “If it had been done the other way, the kids would not have been in school yet.”

Akima’s majority owner is the NANA Regional Corporation. It is represented in Washington by Blank Rome Government Relations, a lobbying firm with close ties to the Bush administration and particularly Tom Ridge, the former head of the Department of Homeland Security, FEMA’s parent agency. NANA’s federal contracts have grown rapidly in recent years, according to the Center for Public Integrity.

Representative Bennie Thompson, a Mississippi Democrat, argues that the Akima deal made no sense. Instead of paying a middleman like Akima or the Mississippi companies, he told the Department of Homeland Security, the federal government should have purchased the classrooms directly. And he complained that FEMA had ignored a requirement to give preference to local businesses.

The transaction, Mr. Thompson wrote to the department’s inspector general, could “result not only in the American taxpayer being exorbitantly overcharged, but will hamper real rebuilding and economic recovery efforts in Mississippi.”

The school construction job is just one of several Hurricane Katrina deals under scrutiny by auditors and Congressional investigators. In awarding those contracts – for roof tarps, debris removal and mobile homes – the federal government said it had to move quickly and often turned to proven contractors accustomed to large-scale work.

The classrooms would have been by far the largest project ever undertaken by the Mississippi company seeking the contract, its owners acknowledge. The business, Adams Hardware and Home Center, has been selling modular classrooms statewide for decades and operates a local mobile home park.

Adams is based in Yazoo City, Miss., about 200 miles north of Bay St. Louis, in a hardware store with a hornets’ nest hanging, an eight-point buck with a cigarette stuffed in its mouth and a life-size doll whose head is buried in a toilet outside.

After Hurricane Katrina passed, the father and two sons who run the business recognized that the calamity could turn into a windfall for them and a frequent partner, Magnolia State School Products of Columbus, Miss. Hundreds of schools across the state were damaged or destroyed.

“We set out to do this project not only, of course, to make a profit but to create jobs within our own community,” said Kent Adams, the son of the owner, Paul Adams Jr., and manager of the business.

Calling their usual suppliers, they identified a Florida dealer and a Georgia manufacturer that could soon deliver more than 400 classrooms, Mr. Adams said. They proposed a deal for about $24 million, including transportation. That included a profit of about $4 million above the $19.7 million it would cost to acquire and transport the units, the contract documents show.

But when Adams and Magnolia approached the state education department with the offer, they were referred to the Corps of Engineers, which then referred them to Akima.

Akima (pronounced AH-kahmah) is a 10-year-old enterprise jointly owned by 14,000 Inupiat and Unangan Native Alaskans. Thanks to a law passed in 1971, it is one of several native-owned businesses eligible for no-bid federal contracts. Senator Ted Stevens, Republican of Alaska, has long pushed for changes in contracting rules that have helped enrich Alaskan companies.

Akima, now based in Charlotte, N.C., has 1,300 full- or part-time employees who work on 22 federal contracts, mostly with the military. It also has an agreement with the Army to supply modular buildings.

Mr. Wood said that neither Akima nor NANA used any ties to elected officials to pursue contracts, despite assertions in a Mississippi newspaper that the classroom deal may have been the result of political connections.

“We have never used or attempted to use political influence for any contract involving Akima,” he said. “That is fact.”

After Hurricane Katrina, FEMA asked the corps to help Mississippi reopen schools. The corps passed the assignment on to Akima.

The Adams company, as requested, faxed letters to Akima on Sept. 16, outlining its arrangements to acquire the portable classrooms.

But there were a few details the Adamses did not note in their faxes. Paul Adams Jr. had agreed to plead guilty in 1990 to a charge that he conspired with Magnolia to fix prices by divvying up the Mississippi modular classroom business.

Kent Adams said they did not disclose the matter because he and his father did not consider it relevant. The corps asks applicants to disclose such information for only the last three years. The charges were dismissed after his father paid a $1,000 fine and was put on probation.

Akima was not aware of the case until after it dropped Adams Home Center from the deal. But its executives were worried about other issues, Mr. Wood said. Akima concluded that the Mississippi business could not deliver as many classrooms as promised. That meant Akima could not meet deadlines set by the Corps, which wanted 200 classrooms in 14 days and the rest within 45 days, or by the end of October.

“He could not satisfy the schedule,” Mr. Wood said.

Contract documents show that the Adamses had miscalculated how many classrooms the Georgia manufacturer had said it could provide. But Kent Adams said that after he and his father learned of the mistake, they identified alternate suppliers to make up the difference.

A day after the shortfall was identified, Akima completed a $39.6 million no-bid deal with the corps that did not include Adams Home Center.

Under the agreement, the corps would pay $87,892 per classroom, far more than the $55,545 Adams intended to charge, contract documents show.

Mr. Wood said the higher price was justified because Akima had to buy more expensive units and hire 187 truck drivers to meet the Corps deadlines. They had to pay twice the normal rate for drivers, he said.

“We did not gouge the government,” he said, declining to disclose the company’s profit. “If you had until next summer to deliver these trailers, you could get it cheaper.”

But so far, government auditors are not convinced.

“We have concerns that the government may be paying more than necessary,” Mr. Cooper, of the G.A.O., said in written testimony presented to Congress this week, adding that there was evidence of inflated prices. The auditors are also inquiring about how the classrooms were installed. After Akima delivered them, the structures were placed atop concrete blocks, with a series of straps tied to anchors drilled into the ground. Plywood walkways were then built, linking the classrooms.

A Mississippi State Board of Education code does not permit concrete blocks and piers to anchor modular units. Instead, it requires that they be built on foundations consisting of steel posts secured by poured-in-place concrete.

Regina Ginn, a director in the state office that imposes the standards, said she knew the new classrooms did not fully comply with the state code. But Ms. Ginn added that she considered the corps approach sufficient, an assessment endorsed by Jerry Brosius, a Pennsylvania engineer who has installed modular classrooms for more than 20 years.

“These are temporary buildings,” Mr. Brosius said. “They are not going to be there for 20 years.”

Michael H. Logue, a spokesman for the Corps of Engineers regional office in Vicksburg, Miss., defended the classroom deal. “We executed the fastest, most reasonable procurement action we genuinely felt was available to us,” Mr. Logue said.

Akima met its corps deadlines for the classrooms. The total cost for the corps project to date has been $72 million, because of additional work, installing modular offices for government agencies and building walkways.

The project was not a total loss for Adams Home Center and its partner: They were paid a $200,000 finder’s fee by the classroom supplier because Akima bought the units they had identified. But the Adamses have filed a lawsuit seeking some of the profits they had hoped to collect, to which Akima already has said they have no right to claim.

In Bay St. Louis, where homes and stores are still largely ruins, the debate over the classroom costs or contractor seem irrelevant.

“School being back for these children is a break from the reality of destroyed homes,” said Johnette Bilbo, a teacher at North Bay. “It is just a start. But this is the first large step back to normalcy and routine in their lives.”

Now the Good News: Democrats Sweep Challengers for City Council

Democratic auditor also keeps position, so party will stay in charge of City Hall

Wednesday, November 09, 2005
Mark Ferenchik and Jodi Andes
THE COLUMBUS DISPATCH

Three Columbus City Council Democrats defeated their Republican challengers yesterday.

Democrats Maryellen O’Shaughnessy, Kevin Boyce and Mary Jo Hudson will begin their new four-year terms in January.

Republican challengers Eddie Pauline, Alisia Clark and Phil Harmon wonder what their political futures hold.

Meanwhile, longtime Democratic Auditor Hugh Dorrian swept over Republican challenger Lynn Sautter, maintaining his party’s lock on City Hall.

The victory marks O’Shaughnessy’s third, Boyce’s second and Hudson’s first. Hudson was appointed to the council in September 2004 to replace Richard W. Sensenbrenner.

“It will probably hit me in a couple of days,” Hudson said. “This has been a long 14 months.”

The three claimed victory well before 10 p.m. to supporters who packed a meeting room Downtown at the Crowne Plaza Hotel.

With his smiling 6-year-old son, Christopher, at his side, Boyce said the three worked hard as a team and that they will continue to do so with a tight city budget ahead.

Though their victories mean a continuation of the status quo — it also marked a first: Hudson is the first openly gay person to be elected to the council, a distinction she did not bring up on the campaign trail.

“I know a lot of you have waited a long time for this and I’m happy we could get here,” Hudson said to a small group of supporters and family.

Republicans, hamstrung by a dearth of campaign cash and the TV ads it buys, tried to stir the pot by focusing on one-party rule at City Hall.

It didn’t work.

No Republican has served on the council since Jennette Bradley left to become Gov. Bob Taft’s lieutenant governor in January 2003.

Pauline, 26, the former president of Ohio State University’s Undergraduate Student Government, said it’s hard to compete when Council President Matt Habash’s campaign contributed $18,000 each to Boyce’s and Hudson’s campaigns. Now that the election’s over, Pauline said he’s thinking about pursuing a ballot initiative to create a ward system. Phil Harmon, the community activist and Republican who was not endorsed by party leaders, said he’d have to think hard about another run. “I think the Democratic machine in this city is strong,” Harmon said. “I don’t think the Republican base is there.”

At Broadleigh Elementary School on the city’s East Side, Michell Brown made it clear who her favorite was.

“Alisia Clark is my girl. She’s honest. She’s Christian,” said Brown, 40, who attends the same church as Clark.

But 51-year-old state employee Natalie Childs voted for Boyce, Hudson and O’Shaughnessy.

“I think they’re making a good-faith effort to make changes in the community,” Childs said.

Bad News First: Issue 1 is Lone Winner in Ohio

4 constitutional amendments designed to reform state government suffer resounding defeats
Wednesday, November 09, 2005
Joe Hallett and Mark Niquette
THE COLUMBUS DISPATCH

Ohio voters yesterday resoundingly rejected four amendments to the state constitution, rendering a stinging defeat to would-be reformers who said the issues were necessary to end a “culture of corruption” in state government.

Meanwhile, Issue 1, a $2 billion bond package that Gov. Bob Taft and others promised will bring high-tech jobs to an economically struggling state, was headed for passage.

In an off-year election, voters turned thumbs down on a confusing menu of amendments that would have changed Ohio government at its core. Issues 2-5 were losing statewide by a 2-to-1 ratio and as much as 4-to-1 in Republican-dominated rural and exurban counties.

The defeat of the four issues championed by Reform Ohio Now, a coalition of Democratic-leaning groups, was attributed to their complicated and confusing ballot language and unified opposition by powerful Republican forces under the umbrella of Ohio First.

“The proponents always have a greater hurdle to overcome than the opponents,” said Herb Asher, an Ohio State University political-science professor and a leader of Reform Ohio Now. “All they had to do was either confuse voters or scare them, and they did that well.”

State Rep. Kevin DeWine, R-Fairborn and a leader of Ohio First, said the opposition was helped by what he called “overly complicated and unnecessarily complex” issues, and that when unsure, voters tend to vote “no.”

DeWine did not characterize the defeat of Issues 2-5 as absolution by voters of the scandals that have wracked the GOPcontrolled state government.

With 90 percent of the statewide vote tallied:

• Issue 1 was passing 54 percent to 46 percent. The $2 billion bond issue includes $1.35 billion for local road, bridge and water projects; $500 million for the state’s Third Frontier program to develop high-tech jobs; and $150 million to develop business-ready sites, such as industrial parks.

• Issue 2 was failing 64 percent to 36 percent. It would have permitted voters to request an absentee ballot up to 35 days before an election without giving a valid reason as previously required. The legislature pre-empted the issue by enacting the same provisions.

• Issue 3 was failing 67 percent to 33 percent. It would have limited annual individual and political-action-committee contributions to statewide candidates to $2,000, and $1,000 to legislative candidates, down from the current $10,000 limit for both.

• Issue 4 was failing 70 percent to 30 percent. Voters rejected handing responsibility for drawing legislative and congressional districts every 10 years to a five-member appointed commission. The commission would have been required to adopt the plan with the highest “competitiveness had conceded that revamping the redistricting process was the most important of the four issues, but they said the others were added to build a coalition of good-government groups such as Common Cause and attract financial support from Democratic-leaning organizations still stewing about the 2004 presidential race in Ohio.

• Issue 5 was failing 71 percent to 29 percent. Voters said no to stripping all election oversight from the secretary of state and giving the job to an appointed nine-member board.

Edward B. “Ned” Foley, an Ohio State University electionlaw expert, said the reformers tried to do too much. “I think the RON group overreached both in putting too many issues on the ballot and in the particular way that it wrote several of the issues,” Foley said.

Interviews with voters indicated widespread confusion about the impact of the four amendments after multimillion-dollar media campaigns in which both sides used images of the unpopular Taft to assert that the issues would or would not clean up corruption at the Statehouse.

“It was hard to cut through the noise coming from both sides,” Joe Hamrock, 42, a utility-company employee, said after voting at the Grange Hall in Westerville.

Even though voters rejected Issue 4, Republican Statehouse leaders are left with a responsibility to reform a redistricting process they acknowledged is flawed, Foley said.

“The public discussion that’s occurred on Issue 4 ought to pave the way for a bipartisan consensus on how to do it right that would benefit all citizens,” Foley said. “The current system allows for partisan manipulation, and both the Democrats and Republicans have abused it.”

DeWine said he expects to offer ideas about other possible approaches to redistricting by the first of the year.

Taft thanked Issue 1 supporters gathered at a Downtown restaurant last night and credited an aggressive, grassroots campaign for success after the Third Frontier component failed on its own at the ballot in 2003.

Critics called the Third Frontier “corporate welfare” and said complained that it was combined with the popular construction-funding program that doesn’t expire until 2007.

Taft said the combination made sense as a comprehensive strategy, calling the issue “the perfect marriage of priorities, all focused on the future economy of Ohio.”

Many voters took newspaper clippings and party mailings into polling places to help them interpret the ballot issues. Some said they still didn’t fully understand them.

“I left them blank,” said Jodi Dennis, 44, of Upper Arlington. “I just didn’t know enough about them to go either way.”

In Westerville, Faith Barker, 46, said she voted against all five issues: “It was too unclear to me how they would go about reforming the system. It’s way too confusing when they put all that stuff on the ballot at one time.”

US military accused of using white phosphorus bombs against Iraqi civilians

Italian state TV, Rai, has broadcast a documentary accusing the US military of using white phosphorus bombs against civilians in the Iraqi city of Falluja.

Rai says this amounts to the illegal use of chemical arms, though the bombs are considered incendiary devices.

Eyewitnesses and ex-US soldiers say the weapon was used in built-up areas in the insurgent-held city.

The US military denies this, but admits using white phosphorus bombs in Iraq to illuminate battlefields.

Washington is not a signatory of an international treaty restricting the use of white phosphorus devices.

Transmission of the documentary comes a day after the arrival of Iraqi President Jalal Talabani on a five-day official visit to Italy.

It also coincides with the first anniversary of the US-led assault on Falluja, which displaced most of the city’s 300,000 population and left many of its buildings destroyed.

The documentary was shown on Rai’s rolling news channel, with a warning that the some of the footage was disturbing.

The future of the 3,000-strong Italian peacekeeping contingent in Iraq is the subject of a political tug-of-war, says the BBC’s David Willey in Rome.

‘Destroyed evidence’

The documentary begins with formerly classified footage of the Americans using napalm bombs during the Vietnam war.

It then shows a series of photographs from Falluja of corpses with the flesh burnt off but clothes still intact – which it says is consistent with the effects of white phosphorus on humans.

Jeff Englehart, described as a former US soldier who served in Falluja, tells of how he heard orders for white phosphorus to be deployed over military radio – and saw the results.

“Burned bodies, burned women, burned children; white phosphorus kills indiscriminately… When it makes contact with skin, then it’s absolutely irreversible damage, burning flesh to the bone,” he says.

Last December, the US state department issued a denial of what it called “widespread myths” about the use of illegal weapons in Falluja.

“Phosphorus shells are not outlawed. US forces have used them very sparingly in Falluja, for illumination purposes. They were fired into the air to illuminate enemy positions at night, not at enemy fighters,” the US statement said.

However, the Rai film also alleges that Washington has systematically attempted to destroy filmed evidence of the alleged use of white phosphorus on civilians in Falluja.

Italian public opinion has been consistently against the war and the Rai documentary can only reinforce calls for a pullout of Italian soldiers as soon as possible, our correspondent says.

Both the Italian government and opposition leaders are talking about a phased withdrawal in 2006.

President Talabani and the US say the continued presence of multi-national forces in Iraq is essential.

Story from BBC NEWS
Published: 2005/11/08 14:21:45 GMT
© BBC MMV

——- Personal Note ——–
You want to see what this stuff is going to these innocent Iraqi civilians? See what this Google Images search turned up.

did you?

Greenhouse gases to rise by 52% by 2030

Global greenhouse gas emissions will rise by 52% by 2030, unless the world takes action to reduce energy consumption, a study has warned.

The prediction comes from the latest annual World Energy Outlook report from the International Energy Agency (IEA).

It says that under current consumption trends, energy demand will also rise by more than 50% over the next 25 years.

The IEA adds that oil prices will “substantially” rise unless there is extra investment in oil facilities.

It says the world has seen “years of under-investment” in both oil production and the refinery sector.

The organisation estimates that the global oil industry now needs to invest $20.3 trillion (£12 trillion) in fresh facilities by 2030, or else the wider global economy could suffer.

‘Unsustainable’

“These projected trends have important implications and lead to a future that is not sustainable,” said IEA chief Claude Mandil.

“We must change these outcomes and get the planet onto a sustainable energy path.”

The IEA’s warning comes at a time when the Kyoto climate change agreement calls on developed nations to cut their greenhouse gas emissions to 5% below 1990 levels by 2008-12.

It also cautions that oil producers need to double annual investments in their oil fields or else see another £13 a barrel on the projected price of oil over the next 25 years.

Economic impact

The IEA says this extra investment is vital to avoid the supply bottlenecks that saw oil prices rise above $70 a barrel in late August.

“If investments do not come in a timely and sufficient manner, there will be higher oil prices, and global economic growth will suffer,” said IEA chief economist Fatih Birol.

The IEA says the world has enough oil supplies to last until 2030, and that the core issue is instead the need to improve the supply chain.

Greenpeace said the latest figures from the IEA showed just how important it was for countries to meet their Kyoto targets.

“The Kyoto protocol doesn’t amount to much in terms of emissions reductions but at least it breaks the curve [of rising emissions] among countries that have accepted its targets,” said Steve Sawyer, climate policy expert at the environmental pressure group.

“We have to work out the trick of how to get the US and the rapidly industrialising developing countries to break the curve as well.”

The IEA is made up of the 26 main industrialised nations who are the major oil consumers.

Story from BBC NEWS
Published: 2005/11/07 14:04:27 GMT
© BBC MMV