Think Ron Paul only got 9% of NH votes yesterday? Think again, that’s not democracy you smell.
There are allegations of vote fraud (not in the MSM of course) in yesterday’s NH Primary, hurting guess who? Ron Paul of course. A sure sign of things to come? I’d say.
New Hampshire District Admits Ron Paul Votes Not Counted
“…The head clerk of the New Hampshire town of Sutton has been forced to admit that Ron Paul received 31 votes yet when the final amount was transferred to a summary sheet and sent out to the media, the total was listed as zero. The fiasco throws the entire primary into doubt and could lead to a re-count.
As we reported earlier today, an entire family voted for Ron Paul in Sutton, yet when the voting map on the Politico website was posted, the total votes for Ron Paul were zero.
Vote fraud expert Bev Harris contacted the head clerk in Sutton, Jennifer Call, who was forced to admit that the 31 votes Ron Paul received were completely omitted from the final report sheet, claiming “human error” was responsible for the mistake.
Two or three votes not counted could be a plausible mistake - but 31 votes for one candidate?
‘The classic method for rigging a hand count is to write the wrong number on the form,’ Harris told the Alex Jones Show.”
As expected by many, I think it’s safe to say the vote-stealing is well underway. NOW is when it’s so important to start spreading the news and make sure they know we’re paying attention! This is when technology is most powerful. We MUST disseminate this information far and wide— stop the passivity! Let them know we’re watching!
Keep these kinds of stories in mind as the primaries start up — if we are to ever witness Ron Paul win the Presidency, we MUST ensure fair elections as well as turn out voters.
The price of liberty is eternal vigilance, which means demanding accountability for suspicious election results. Giuliani got 9.11% in three towns, we’re supposed to believe that crap?
What’s wrong with Diebold, some of you may ask? Maybe this YouTube video from Princeton Univ. will scare some sense into you.
Have we learned nothing from 2000? How about 2004? 2008 MUST be the year that people get involved in the voting reform movement and demand an end to proprietary-software voting machines (Diebold) that make a transparent democracy impossible.
If we are expected to pay trillions of dollars bringing democracy to Iraq, shouldn’t we have it ourselves first?
To close, I’d like to share a great article from the Daily Paul on the importance of a fair vote count : Restoring Accountability to Vote Counting:
“Did vote fraud take place last night? With everything I’ve heard about electioneering and about Diebold, I have strong suspicions. The point is I can’t prove anything. Why not? Because Diebold’s software is “proprietary” - in other words, secret. But in addition to making voting machines, Diebold is also the manufacturer many cash machines that we use every day. Have you ever gone to a cash machine that doesn’t give a receipt? Would you accept that as just the way it is? Why can’t Diebold’s voting machines give receipts?
Better yet, why not have voting machines based on open source software that programmers can analyze and discuss? Lots of the internet runs on open source software - anyone can look at the code and what is going on and how. Linux, Apache, MySQL, PHP and Drupal - the software that the Daily Paul runs on is all open source, open to inspection, created by the community for the benefit of all.
Or even better yet, why not bring back paper voting? What is the rush to count the ballots and declare winners? Is speed more important than truth?”
This $hit has got to stop!
…Just so I don’t end on a bad note, here’s a treat for you: check out the bombass “Ron Paul Revolution Theme Song” by Aimee Allen.
[Click here to read previous posts about Ron Paul.]
0 Comments on “Caught red-handed: Ron Paul votes not counted in NH district”
Post a Comment: